Sentra alternative: Qualia,
the company brain that ships.

Context

What Sentra is.

Sentra positions itself as “The Company Brain for your teams and agents.” It captures every interaction, decision, and drift, and writes it into one queryable, bi-temporal graph that your team and your agents share. Sentra's own framing is precise: it is “a system of record for how your company thinks.”

Sentra is genuinely best-in-class at what it does. Bi-temporal context, confidence-scored identity resolution, drift detection, 200+ integrations, REST + MCP APIs, SOC 2 Type II + ISO 27001, and self-hostable up to air-gapped. If your primary problem is “we lose context, our decisions are ungoverned, our agents can't get up to speed,” Sentra solves it more thoroughly than anyone else in the market.

The gap

Where Sentra stops.

Read Sentra's homepage carefully. Every verb is memory-scoped: captures every interaction, writes it into a graph, queryable by teams and agents, detects drift, surfaces the source of truth.

Not one verb ships anything. Not one verb closes a loop. Sentra is a system of record. It records so that other systems (your engineers, your PMs, your agents) can act.

For companies with dedicated engineering teams and mature agent pipelines already in place, that's the right layer to buy. For portfolio operators running 15 products with 8 people, buying pure memory means still having to build the action layer yourself. That's not scaling, that's more work.

Difference

What Qualia adds.

Qualia is the AI employee for portfolio operators. It's both the memory Sentra offers AND the acting workforce on top of it.

• Same memory scope, different verb set. Qualia's memory captures the same things Sentra does: interactions, decisions, drift, meetings, tickets. But Qualia's memory is coupled to agents that act. Every stored decision can trigger a workflow. Every drift can open a ticket.
• Portfolio scope from day one. Qualia is built for multi-product operators (2 to 10 people, 3 to 20 products). Signals in one product become evidence in another. Sentra is scope-agnostic, which means you have to configure the topology yourself.
• Action verbs Sentra doesn't claim. Qualia drafts your pull requests from error reports. Writes new agents on demand when you describe a task in plain English. Answers customer support with full portfolio context. Publishes content after critique. Sends the follow-up emails. These are outside Sentra's product boundary by design.
• Time-to-value. Sentra typically requires a memory ingestion + graph configuration phase before value shows up. Qualia comes with an agent workforce pre-configured for portfolio operations. First value is the morning brief on day one.

Comparison

Feature comparison.

Pricing

Pricing.

Sentra pricing is not public and requires a sales conversation. Enterprise deployments with air-gapped hosting scale into the tens of thousands per month.

Qualia is priced per portfolio, not per seat or per agent. Portfolio operators (2 to 10 person teams) get transparent tier pricing.

Fit

When to pick Sentra.

Pick Sentra if your primary problem is organizational memory, not action. You already have engineers and agents; you just need a shared graph. You need bi-temporal memory as a first-class primitive. You need self-hosted or air-gapped deployment today for compliance reasons. You have the internal engineering to build the action layer on top yourself.

When to pick Qualia.

Pick Qualia if you need memory AND agents that act on it in one product. You run 3 to 20 products with a 2 to 10 person team. You want to draft PRs from errors, write agents on demand, send emails, close tickets, publish content, all from the same brain. You want first value on day one, not after a multi-week configuration. You want founder-scale pricing, not enterprise-only.

FAQ

Questions teams ask
before switching.

Keep reading

Related.

• What is a company brain?
• What is an AI employee?
• Qualia vs Hyper
• Use case: institutional memory